Is Voice AI Worth It? New ROI Insights for Insurers

Amir Prodensky
CEO
Dec 5, 2025
7 min read
Real cost savings, conversion gains, and operational impact explained
Key takeaways:
Voice AI delivers ROI when deployed in specific high-volume workflows like FNOL, billing, claims status, and underwriting triage.
Automation drives major cost savings. Typical carriers see 30–70% containment, reduced AHT, lower staffing needs, and fewer claim errors.
Financial returns are fast. Many insurers achieve 3–6× ROI in the first year, with payback in under 3 months.
Success depends on focused rollout. Start narrow (billing or status calls), integrate deeply, and expand based on measurable results.
ROI fails when scope is too broad or poorly integrated. The winners treat Voice AI as a long-term operational capability, not a one-off tool.
Insurers are once again revisiting Voice AI, but this time with a very different mindset.
Earlier generations of automated voice systems (IVRs, simple phone bots) promised cost savings but often delivered customer frustration. Modern Voice AI, however, is not a menu system or a rules-based bot. It’s a conversational, adaptive, analytics-rich interface powered by large language models and enterprise-grade speech recognition.
For insurers facing tight margins, competitive pressure, and rising CX expectations, Voice AI is emerging as a compelling tool. But the practical question (“Is it worth it?”), requires more than hype.
It requires ROI clarity.
And the industry is already signaling the answer: while 57% of leaders expect measurable ROI within 12 months, organizations are already capturing value. Consistent with last quarter, 97% of leaders are seeing productivity gains, 94% report improved profitability, and 91% say the quality of work itself is rising.
This paper provides data-driven, operational, and financial insights to help insurers evaluate the real return on investing in Voice AI.
Where Voice AI Actually Creates Value in Insurance
The ROI depends on where the technology is deployed. Below are the highest-yield use cases, the reason they work, and what insurers typically achieve.
First Notice of Loss (FNOL)
Why FNOL is ideal for Voice AI:
High volume
Emotionally charged calls
Repetitive question patterns
Data collection is structured
High cost for human-only handling
What Voice AI can do:
Guide callers through step-by-step data capture
Summarize claims
Populate core system fields
Detect fraud signals
Escalate complex cases to humans with context
Typical outcomes:
30–50% reduction in FNOL handling time
10–20% reduction in claim cycle time (faster routing, faster documentation)
Improved fraud detection accuracy at intake
ROI Rationale: Faster FNOL improves customer satisfaction, reduces leakage, and cuts staffing requirements during peak events.
Billing & Payments
Billing calls make up 20–35% of contact center volume at many carriers.
Voice AI can:
Answer balance and policy questions
Take payments
Walk through billing changes
Manage due-date inquiries
Typical outcomes:
50–70% containment on billing calls
Lower abandonment
Reduced PCI risk (AI can handle secure payment entry)
ROI Rationale: Automating repetitive billing inquiries is one of the fastest payback Voice AI deployments, often achieving positive ROI in < 12 months due to volume alone.
Underwriting Triage and Pre-Qualification
Underwriting teams spend time chasing missing data and sorting submissions.
Voice AI can:
Call applicants or brokers for missing information
Pre-qualify small commercial or personal-lines submissions
Document conversations and attach summaries to the file
Typical outcomes:
20–30% reduction in underwriting workload
Faster quote turnaround
Cleaner submissions → higher bind rates
ROI Rationale: By removing low-value tasks, underwriters spend more time on risk evaluation and relationship-driven selling.
Claims Status Calls
This is one of the most labor-intensive but easy-to-automate categories.
Voice AI can:
Provide real-time claim status
Update customers on adjuster assignments
Proactively notify policyholders of changes
Typical outcomes:
60–80% automation possible
Significant call deflection from adjusters
Higher NPS due to proactive communication
ROI Rationale: Reducing inbound status calls protects adjuster time, often saving the highest-value human roles.
Agent Support and Policy Servicing
Voice AI is increasingly used internally for agents who need quick answers.
Voice AI can:
Lookup underwriting rules
Retrieve policy details
Provide scripting for regulated interactions
Help agents produce disclosures
Typical outcomes:
20–25% improvement in agent handle time
Reduced regulatory errors
Faster onboarding of new reps
ROI Rationale: Unlike customer-facing automations, agent-assist has extremely high adoption and low risk.
How Strada Directly Accelerates Voice AI ROI
Strada delivers the outcomes described in this paper by providing insurance-specific conversational agents and pre-built workflows that turn calls into immediate business action.
Instead of generic automation, Strada plugs directly into underwriting, claims, AMS, billing, and CRM systems so insurers see measurable ROI from day one.
What makes Strada correlate strongly with these ROI drivers:
ROI Driver | How Strada Supports It |
High containment on repetitive workflows | Pre-built flows for FNOL, billing, renewals, policy servicing, and agent support, trained on insurance language out of the box. |
Lower cost per call | AI agents answer 24/7, using intelligent retries, call scheduling, and real-time comprehension to replace manual volume. |
Reduced leakage & cycle time | Workflows automatically update CRMs, trigger tasks, send SMS/email follow-ups, and write back to core systems the moment a call ends. |
Faster follow-ups & fewer errors | Built-in accuracy evaluation tools reduce compliance errors and ensure consistent disclosures. |
Scalable operations without extra staffing | Strada handles peak loads and CAT-level surges with no engineering lift or additional personnel. |
Why it matters: Strada isn’t just a Voice AI engine; it’s an insurance operations platform that links conversational intelligence to real business actions, directly boosting containment, AHT reduction, policy retention, and claim cycle acceleration.
The Real Economics: How to Calculate Voice AI ROI
Voice AI is only “worth it” when the financial and operational benefits outweigh the investment. Below is a practical ROI framework tailored to insurers.
Cost Drivers Voice AI Reduces
Contact Center Costs
Lower headcount or lower peak staffing
Reduced overtime during CAT events
Less training spend
Lower QA and coaching requirements
Claims Costs
Faster FNOL → fewer errors → less leakage
Better documentation → fewer disputes
Improved fraud detection
Compliance Costs
Automated disclosures reduce risk of fines
Call transcripts create built-in auditability
Technology & Operational Costs
AI reduces reliance on legacy IVR upgrades
Lower call transfer and repeat-call costs
The ROI Formula for Voice AI
A simplified financial model insurers often use:
ROI=Labor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI CostAI Cost\text{ROI} = \frac{\text{Labor Savings} + \text{Claim Savings} + \text{Compliance Savings} + \text{Revenue Lift} - \text{AI Cost}}{\text{AI Cost}}ROI=AI CostLabor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI Cost
Where “AI Cost” includes:
Platform subscription
Telephony fees
Implementation and training
System integration
Sample ROI Scenario (Practical & Conservative)
For a mid-sized insurer:
1M inbound calls/year
Average cost per human-handled call: $6–$8
Voice AI automates 30% of volume (300k calls)
Automated call cost: $0.50–$1.00
Annual Savings:
Labor savings: (300k calls × $6) – (300k × $1) = $1.5M
Reduced claim leakage: ~1–2% improvement → $500k–$1M
Compliance/QA savings: ~$250k
Total benefit: $2.25M–$2.75M
Annual Voice AI cost: $600k–$900k
ROI: ~3× return in year one
Payback period: 4–7 months
This scenario is typical for carriers with moderate automation and no extreme call volume spikes.
Critical Success Factors: When Voice AI Works vs. Fails
The ROI is not only about the technology. It’s about implementation strategy.
When Voice AI Works Well
Clear, repetitive workflows
Strong integration with policy/claims systems
Good training data for call types
A phased rollout (e.g., start with billing or claims status)
Executive sponsorship + call center buy-in
Successful insurers treat Voice AI as a long-term capability, not a one-time project.
When Voice AI Fails
Overly broad scope at launch
Poor speech recognition tuning
Lack of escalation paths to humans
Not changing internal processes
No measurement framework
The fastest way to kill ROI is to launch “everything at once” with generic flows.
Adoption Triggers in the Insurance Industry
Insurers typically adopt Voice AI because of one or more of the following:
Labor shortages
High claims volume / CAT events
Digital transformation mandates
Cost pressure
Regulatory audit findings
Growing policyholder expectations for 24/7 service
These triggers often speed up business cases and unlock funding.
Measuring Voice AI ROI: What Insurers Should Track
These metrics provide the clearest visibility into value creation.
Category | Metric | Description | Typical Benchmarks (Insurance) |
Automation Metrics | Containment Rate | % of calls fully handled by AI without human intervention | 30–70% depending on use case complexity |
Partial Automation | AI completes part of the workflow; agent finishes | 20–40% of remaining calls show meaningful time reduction | |
Transfer Reduction | Decrease in agent-to-agent or IVR transfers | 20–50% reduction | |
AHT Improvement | Drop in average handle time via pre-gathered info or full automation | 10–40% improvement | |
Customer Metrics | CSAT / NPS for Voice AI Journeys | Customer satisfaction with AI-led interactions | Often equal or higher than human-only journeys; +5 to +20 points |
Call Abandonment Rate | Fewer callers hanging up due to wait times | Reduced to <5%, sometimes <2% | |
First-Call Resolution (FCR) | Issues resolved in one interaction | 70–90% for structured intents | |
Operational Metrics | Claims Cycle Times | Speed from FNOL to settlement milestones | 5–20% faster, depending on automation scope |
Underwriting Turnaround Times | Time required to qualify and price risk | 10–30% faster with automated intake | |
Inquiry Backlogs | Outstanding service queues | 30–80% reduction | |
Agent Productivity | More calls or higher-value work handled per agent | 20–50% productivity lift | |
Financial Metrics | Cost per Call | Fully loaded cost per customer interaction | Reduced from $4–$14 → <$1 with AI |
Staffing Reduction | Lower need for temp or surge staffing | 10–30% reduction without layoffs, often via attrition | |
Claim Leakage Reduction | Avoidable overpayments due to errors or delays | 1–3% reduction depending on claim type | |
Revenue Lift | Retention + faster follow-up + better lead routing | 1–5% lift in high-volume lines |
Insurers who track these KPIs monthly typically see ROI more clearly and justify expansion into new call types.
Implementation Roadmap: A Practical 3-Phase Approach
Below is a highly usable roadmap insurers have successfully executed.
Phase 1: Prove Value in 90 Days (Pilot)
Scope examples:
Billing inquiries
Claim status calls
Simple FNOL workflows
Key actions:
Map 5–10 common call intents
Integrate with telephony and CRM
Train with historical transcripts
Route complex calls to humans
Success criteria:
≥30% containment
Positive customer feedback
Reduced AHT
Phase 2: Expand to High-Value Journeys
Scope examples:
Full FNOL
Underwriting triage
Proactive outbound notifications
Key actions:
Integrate deeper into policy admin/claims systems
Add fraud-signal detection
Automate SMS/email follow-ups
Success criteria:
Measurable claim cycle-time reduction
Reduced backlogs
Lower labor demand
Phase 3: Enterprise-Wide Voice AI
Scope examples:
Agent assist for contact center
Agent assist for underwriting
Broker support interactions
End-to-end policy servicing
Key actions:
Standardize AI operations
Automate QA and compliance reviews
Use AI analytics to improve products
Build internal Voice AI governance
Success criteria:
Consistent cost-per-call reduction
Year-over-year claim leakage improvement
Reduced training time for staff
Risks, Limitations, & Mitigations
Voice AI is powerful, but insurers must plan for common pitfalls.
Category | Risk | Mitigation |
Accuracy Issues | Misunderstood customer speech or background noise | Use domain-specific language models; tune for accents; test with real claimants |
Regulatory Complexity | Noncompliant disclosures or procedural mistakes | Hard-code required disclosures; maintain full transcripts for auditability |
Customer Perception | Negative reaction to automation or perceived loss of human touch | Offer instant “talk to a person” fallback; keep explanations clear and human-friendly |
Integration Delays | Projects stalling due to missing access to internal systems | Phase integrations; begin with low-integration use cases to build organizational buy-in |
Over-automation | Applying AI to sensitive or judgment-heavy claim scenarios | Use AI for data gathering and routine tasks; keep humans for empathy and complex decisions |
Conclusion: Is Voice AI Worth It for Insurers?
Yes! When implemented strategically, Voice AI delivers one of the fastest and strongest ROIs in the insurance technology stack.
The value is clearest in:
Claims intake
Billing
Policy servicing
Underwriting triage
Status updates
Insurers regularly achieve:
2×–4× ROI in year one
30–70% automation on targeted call types
Reduced handling time, leakage, and operational costs
Improved customer and agent experience
The key is not investing in “Voice AI everywhere,” but in Voice AI where it works best: high-volume, predictable, repetitive, and data-driven interactions.
With the right roadmap, integrations, and governance, Voice AI becomes a strategic capability that delivers measurable financial value and helps insurers operate faster, leaner, and more competitively.
Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the biggest mistake insurers make when calculating ROI for Voice AI?
They only look at labor savings. Real ROI also comes from leakage reduction, faster claim cycles, fewer compliance errors, and improved retention, which together often outweigh labor savings.
How can insurers avoid over-automating sensitive claim moments?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
Which insurance teams feel the impact of Voice AI first?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
How do insurers know if a Voice AI pilot is succeeding early on?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
Why does Voice AI adoption accelerate during high-volume peaks like CAT events?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
Table of Contents
Carriers, MGAs, and brokers scale revenue-driving phone calls with Strada's conversational AI platform.
Start scaling with voice AI agents today
Join innovative carriers and MGAs transforming their calls with Strada.
Is Voice AI Worth It? New ROI Insights for Insurers

Amir Prodensky
CEO
Dec 5, 2025
7 min read
Real cost savings, conversion gains, and operational impact explained
Key takeaways:
Voice AI delivers ROI when deployed in specific high-volume workflows like FNOL, billing, claims status, and underwriting triage.
Automation drives major cost savings. Typical carriers see 30–70% containment, reduced AHT, lower staffing needs, and fewer claim errors.
Financial returns are fast. Many insurers achieve 3–6× ROI in the first year, with payback in under 3 months.
Success depends on focused rollout. Start narrow (billing or status calls), integrate deeply, and expand based on measurable results.
ROI fails when scope is too broad or poorly integrated. The winners treat Voice AI as a long-term operational capability, not a one-off tool.
Insurers are once again revisiting Voice AI, but this time with a very different mindset.
Earlier generations of automated voice systems (IVRs, simple phone bots) promised cost savings but often delivered customer frustration. Modern Voice AI, however, is not a menu system or a rules-based bot. It’s a conversational, adaptive, analytics-rich interface powered by large language models and enterprise-grade speech recognition.
For insurers facing tight margins, competitive pressure, and rising CX expectations, Voice AI is emerging as a compelling tool. But the practical question (“Is it worth it?”), requires more than hype.
It requires ROI clarity.
And the industry is already signaling the answer: while 57% of leaders expect measurable ROI within 12 months, organizations are already capturing value. Consistent with last quarter, 97% of leaders are seeing productivity gains, 94% report improved profitability, and 91% say the quality of work itself is rising.
This paper provides data-driven, operational, and financial insights to help insurers evaluate the real return on investing in Voice AI.
Where Voice AI Actually Creates Value in Insurance
The ROI depends on where the technology is deployed. Below are the highest-yield use cases, the reason they work, and what insurers typically achieve.
First Notice of Loss (FNOL)
Why FNOL is ideal for Voice AI:
High volume
Emotionally charged calls
Repetitive question patterns
Data collection is structured
High cost for human-only handling
What Voice AI can do:
Guide callers through step-by-step data capture
Summarize claims
Populate core system fields
Detect fraud signals
Escalate complex cases to humans with context
Typical outcomes:
30–50% reduction in FNOL handling time
10–20% reduction in claim cycle time (faster routing, faster documentation)
Improved fraud detection accuracy at intake
ROI Rationale: Faster FNOL improves customer satisfaction, reduces leakage, and cuts staffing requirements during peak events.
Billing & Payments
Billing calls make up 20–35% of contact center volume at many carriers.
Voice AI can:
Answer balance and policy questions
Take payments
Walk through billing changes
Manage due-date inquiries
Typical outcomes:
50–70% containment on billing calls
Lower abandonment
Reduced PCI risk (AI can handle secure payment entry)
ROI Rationale: Automating repetitive billing inquiries is one of the fastest payback Voice AI deployments, often achieving positive ROI in < 12 months due to volume alone.
Underwriting Triage and Pre-Qualification
Underwriting teams spend time chasing missing data and sorting submissions.
Voice AI can:
Call applicants or brokers for missing information
Pre-qualify small commercial or personal-lines submissions
Document conversations and attach summaries to the file
Typical outcomes:
20–30% reduction in underwriting workload
Faster quote turnaround
Cleaner submissions → higher bind rates
ROI Rationale: By removing low-value tasks, underwriters spend more time on risk evaluation and relationship-driven selling.
Claims Status Calls
This is one of the most labor-intensive but easy-to-automate categories.
Voice AI can:
Provide real-time claim status
Update customers on adjuster assignments
Proactively notify policyholders of changes
Typical outcomes:
60–80% automation possible
Significant call deflection from adjusters
Higher NPS due to proactive communication
ROI Rationale: Reducing inbound status calls protects adjuster time, often saving the highest-value human roles.
Agent Support and Policy Servicing
Voice AI is increasingly used internally for agents who need quick answers.
Voice AI can:
Lookup underwriting rules
Retrieve policy details
Provide scripting for regulated interactions
Help agents produce disclosures
Typical outcomes:
20–25% improvement in agent handle time
Reduced regulatory errors
Faster onboarding of new reps
ROI Rationale: Unlike customer-facing automations, agent-assist has extremely high adoption and low risk.
How Strada Directly Accelerates Voice AI ROI
Strada delivers the outcomes described in this paper by providing insurance-specific conversational agents and pre-built workflows that turn calls into immediate business action.
Instead of generic automation, Strada plugs directly into underwriting, claims, AMS, billing, and CRM systems so insurers see measurable ROI from day one.
What makes Strada correlate strongly with these ROI drivers:
ROI Driver | How Strada Supports It |
High containment on repetitive workflows | Pre-built flows for FNOL, billing, renewals, policy servicing, and agent support, trained on insurance language out of the box. |
Lower cost per call | AI agents answer 24/7, using intelligent retries, call scheduling, and real-time comprehension to replace manual volume. |
Reduced leakage & cycle time | Workflows automatically update CRMs, trigger tasks, send SMS/email follow-ups, and write back to core systems the moment a call ends. |
Faster follow-ups & fewer errors | Built-in accuracy evaluation tools reduce compliance errors and ensure consistent disclosures. |
Scalable operations without extra staffing | Strada handles peak loads and CAT-level surges with no engineering lift or additional personnel. |
Why it matters: Strada isn’t just a Voice AI engine; it’s an insurance operations platform that links conversational intelligence to real business actions, directly boosting containment, AHT reduction, policy retention, and claim cycle acceleration.
The Real Economics: How to Calculate Voice AI ROI
Voice AI is only “worth it” when the financial and operational benefits outweigh the investment. Below is a practical ROI framework tailored to insurers.
Cost Drivers Voice AI Reduces
Contact Center Costs
Lower headcount or lower peak staffing
Reduced overtime during CAT events
Less training spend
Lower QA and coaching requirements
Claims Costs
Faster FNOL → fewer errors → less leakage
Better documentation → fewer disputes
Improved fraud detection
Compliance Costs
Automated disclosures reduce risk of fines
Call transcripts create built-in auditability
Technology & Operational Costs
AI reduces reliance on legacy IVR upgrades
Lower call transfer and repeat-call costs
The ROI Formula for Voice AI
A simplified financial model insurers often use:
ROI=Labor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI CostAI Cost\text{ROI} = \frac{\text{Labor Savings} + \text{Claim Savings} + \text{Compliance Savings} + \text{Revenue Lift} - \text{AI Cost}}{\text{AI Cost}}ROI=AI CostLabor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI Cost
Where “AI Cost” includes:
Platform subscription
Telephony fees
Implementation and training
System integration
Sample ROI Scenario (Practical & Conservative)
For a mid-sized insurer:
1M inbound calls/year
Average cost per human-handled call: $6–$8
Voice AI automates 30% of volume (300k calls)
Automated call cost: $0.50–$1.00
Annual Savings:
Labor savings: (300k calls × $6) – (300k × $1) = $1.5M
Reduced claim leakage: ~1–2% improvement → $500k–$1M
Compliance/QA savings: ~$250k
Total benefit: $2.25M–$2.75M
Annual Voice AI cost: $600k–$900k
ROI: ~3× return in year one
Payback period: 4–7 months
This scenario is typical for carriers with moderate automation and no extreme call volume spikes.
Critical Success Factors: When Voice AI Works vs. Fails
The ROI is not only about the technology. It’s about implementation strategy.
When Voice AI Works Well
Clear, repetitive workflows
Strong integration with policy/claims systems
Good training data for call types
A phased rollout (e.g., start with billing or claims status)
Executive sponsorship + call center buy-in
Successful insurers treat Voice AI as a long-term capability, not a one-time project.
When Voice AI Fails
Overly broad scope at launch
Poor speech recognition tuning
Lack of escalation paths to humans
Not changing internal processes
No measurement framework
The fastest way to kill ROI is to launch “everything at once” with generic flows.
Adoption Triggers in the Insurance Industry
Insurers typically adopt Voice AI because of one or more of the following:
Labor shortages
High claims volume / CAT events
Digital transformation mandates
Cost pressure
Regulatory audit findings
Growing policyholder expectations for 24/7 service
These triggers often speed up business cases and unlock funding.
Measuring Voice AI ROI: What Insurers Should Track
These metrics provide the clearest visibility into value creation.
Category | Metric | Description | Typical Benchmarks (Insurance) |
Automation Metrics | Containment Rate | % of calls fully handled by AI without human intervention | 30–70% depending on use case complexity |
Partial Automation | AI completes part of the workflow; agent finishes | 20–40% of remaining calls show meaningful time reduction | |
Transfer Reduction | Decrease in agent-to-agent or IVR transfers | 20–50% reduction | |
AHT Improvement | Drop in average handle time via pre-gathered info or full automation | 10–40% improvement | |
Customer Metrics | CSAT / NPS for Voice AI Journeys | Customer satisfaction with AI-led interactions | Often equal or higher than human-only journeys; +5 to +20 points |
Call Abandonment Rate | Fewer callers hanging up due to wait times | Reduced to <5%, sometimes <2% | |
First-Call Resolution (FCR) | Issues resolved in one interaction | 70–90% for structured intents | |
Operational Metrics | Claims Cycle Times | Speed from FNOL to settlement milestones | 5–20% faster, depending on automation scope |
Underwriting Turnaround Times | Time required to qualify and price risk | 10–30% faster with automated intake | |
Inquiry Backlogs | Outstanding service queues | 30–80% reduction | |
Agent Productivity | More calls or higher-value work handled per agent | 20–50% productivity lift | |
Financial Metrics | Cost per Call | Fully loaded cost per customer interaction | Reduced from $4–$14 → <$1 with AI |
Staffing Reduction | Lower need for temp or surge staffing | 10–30% reduction without layoffs, often via attrition | |
Claim Leakage Reduction | Avoidable overpayments due to errors or delays | 1–3% reduction depending on claim type | |
Revenue Lift | Retention + faster follow-up + better lead routing | 1–5% lift in high-volume lines |
Insurers who track these KPIs monthly typically see ROI more clearly and justify expansion into new call types.
Implementation Roadmap: A Practical 3-Phase Approach
Below is a highly usable roadmap insurers have successfully executed.
Phase 1: Prove Value in 90 Days (Pilot)
Scope examples:
Billing inquiries
Claim status calls
Simple FNOL workflows
Key actions:
Map 5–10 common call intents
Integrate with telephony and CRM
Train with historical transcripts
Route complex calls to humans
Success criteria:
≥30% containment
Positive customer feedback
Reduced AHT
Phase 2: Expand to High-Value Journeys
Scope examples:
Full FNOL
Underwriting triage
Proactive outbound notifications
Key actions:
Integrate deeper into policy admin/claims systems
Add fraud-signal detection
Automate SMS/email follow-ups
Success criteria:
Measurable claim cycle-time reduction
Reduced backlogs
Lower labor demand
Phase 3: Enterprise-Wide Voice AI
Scope examples:
Agent assist for contact center
Agent assist for underwriting
Broker support interactions
End-to-end policy servicing
Key actions:
Standardize AI operations
Automate QA and compliance reviews
Use AI analytics to improve products
Build internal Voice AI governance
Success criteria:
Consistent cost-per-call reduction
Year-over-year claim leakage improvement
Reduced training time for staff
Risks, Limitations, & Mitigations
Voice AI is powerful, but insurers must plan for common pitfalls.
Category | Risk | Mitigation |
Accuracy Issues | Misunderstood customer speech or background noise | Use domain-specific language models; tune for accents; test with real claimants |
Regulatory Complexity | Noncompliant disclosures or procedural mistakes | Hard-code required disclosures; maintain full transcripts for auditability |
Customer Perception | Negative reaction to automation or perceived loss of human touch | Offer instant “talk to a person” fallback; keep explanations clear and human-friendly |
Integration Delays | Projects stalling due to missing access to internal systems | Phase integrations; begin with low-integration use cases to build organizational buy-in |
Over-automation | Applying AI to sensitive or judgment-heavy claim scenarios | Use AI for data gathering and routine tasks; keep humans for empathy and complex decisions |
Conclusion: Is Voice AI Worth It for Insurers?
Yes! When implemented strategically, Voice AI delivers one of the fastest and strongest ROIs in the insurance technology stack.
The value is clearest in:
Claims intake
Billing
Policy servicing
Underwriting triage
Status updates
Insurers regularly achieve:
2×–4× ROI in year one
30–70% automation on targeted call types
Reduced handling time, leakage, and operational costs
Improved customer and agent experience
The key is not investing in “Voice AI everywhere,” but in Voice AI where it works best: high-volume, predictable, repetitive, and data-driven interactions.
With the right roadmap, integrations, and governance, Voice AI becomes a strategic capability that delivers measurable financial value and helps insurers operate faster, leaner, and more competitively.
Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the biggest mistake insurers make when calculating ROI for Voice AI?
They only look at labor savings. Real ROI also comes from leakage reduction, faster claim cycles, fewer compliance errors, and improved retention, which together often outweigh labor savings.
How can insurers avoid over-automating sensitive claim moments?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
Which insurance teams feel the impact of Voice AI first?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
How do insurers know if a Voice AI pilot is succeeding early on?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
Why does Voice AI adoption accelerate during high-volume peaks like CAT events?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
Table of Contents
Carriers, MGAs, and brokers scale revenue-driving phone calls with Strada's conversational AI platform.
Start scaling with voice AI agents today
Join innovative carriers and MGAs transforming their calls with Strada.
Is Voice AI Worth It? New ROI Insights for Insurers

Amir Prodensky
CEO
Dec 5, 2025
7 min read
Real cost savings, conversion gains, and operational impact explained
Key takeaways:
Voice AI delivers ROI when deployed in specific high-volume workflows like FNOL, billing, claims status, and underwriting triage.
Automation drives major cost savings. Typical carriers see 30–70% containment, reduced AHT, lower staffing needs, and fewer claim errors.
Financial returns are fast. Many insurers achieve 3–6× ROI in the first year, with payback in under 3 months.
Success depends on focused rollout. Start narrow (billing or status calls), integrate deeply, and expand based on measurable results.
ROI fails when scope is too broad or poorly integrated. The winners treat Voice AI as a long-term operational capability, not a one-off tool.
Insurers are once again revisiting Voice AI, but this time with a very different mindset.
Earlier generations of automated voice systems (IVRs, simple phone bots) promised cost savings but often delivered customer frustration. Modern Voice AI, however, is not a menu system or a rules-based bot. It’s a conversational, adaptive, analytics-rich interface powered by large language models and enterprise-grade speech recognition.
For insurers facing tight margins, competitive pressure, and rising CX expectations, Voice AI is emerging as a compelling tool. But the practical question (“Is it worth it?”), requires more than hype.
It requires ROI clarity.
And the industry is already signaling the answer: while 57% of leaders expect measurable ROI within 12 months, organizations are already capturing value. Consistent with last quarter, 97% of leaders are seeing productivity gains, 94% report improved profitability, and 91% say the quality of work itself is rising.
This paper provides data-driven, operational, and financial insights to help insurers evaluate the real return on investing in Voice AI.
Where Voice AI Actually Creates Value in Insurance
The ROI depends on where the technology is deployed. Below are the highest-yield use cases, the reason they work, and what insurers typically achieve.
First Notice of Loss (FNOL)
Why FNOL is ideal for Voice AI:
High volume
Emotionally charged calls
Repetitive question patterns
Data collection is structured
High cost for human-only handling
What Voice AI can do:
Guide callers through step-by-step data capture
Summarize claims
Populate core system fields
Detect fraud signals
Escalate complex cases to humans with context
Typical outcomes:
30–50% reduction in FNOL handling time
10–20% reduction in claim cycle time (faster routing, faster documentation)
Improved fraud detection accuracy at intake
ROI Rationale: Faster FNOL improves customer satisfaction, reduces leakage, and cuts staffing requirements during peak events.
Billing & Payments
Billing calls make up 20–35% of contact center volume at many carriers.
Voice AI can:
Answer balance and policy questions
Take payments
Walk through billing changes
Manage due-date inquiries
Typical outcomes:
50–70% containment on billing calls
Lower abandonment
Reduced PCI risk (AI can handle secure payment entry)
ROI Rationale: Automating repetitive billing inquiries is one of the fastest payback Voice AI deployments, often achieving positive ROI in < 12 months due to volume alone.
Underwriting Triage and Pre-Qualification
Underwriting teams spend time chasing missing data and sorting submissions.
Voice AI can:
Call applicants or brokers for missing information
Pre-qualify small commercial or personal-lines submissions
Document conversations and attach summaries to the file
Typical outcomes:
20–30% reduction in underwriting workload
Faster quote turnaround
Cleaner submissions → higher bind rates
ROI Rationale: By removing low-value tasks, underwriters spend more time on risk evaluation and relationship-driven selling.
Claims Status Calls
This is one of the most labor-intensive but easy-to-automate categories.
Voice AI can:
Provide real-time claim status
Update customers on adjuster assignments
Proactively notify policyholders of changes
Typical outcomes:
60–80% automation possible
Significant call deflection from adjusters
Higher NPS due to proactive communication
ROI Rationale: Reducing inbound status calls protects adjuster time, often saving the highest-value human roles.
Agent Support and Policy Servicing
Voice AI is increasingly used internally for agents who need quick answers.
Voice AI can:
Lookup underwriting rules
Retrieve policy details
Provide scripting for regulated interactions
Help agents produce disclosures
Typical outcomes:
20–25% improvement in agent handle time
Reduced regulatory errors
Faster onboarding of new reps
ROI Rationale: Unlike customer-facing automations, agent-assist has extremely high adoption and low risk.
How Strada Directly Accelerates Voice AI ROI
Strada delivers the outcomes described in this paper by providing insurance-specific conversational agents and pre-built workflows that turn calls into immediate business action.
Instead of generic automation, Strada plugs directly into underwriting, claims, AMS, billing, and CRM systems so insurers see measurable ROI from day one.
What makes Strada correlate strongly with these ROI drivers:
ROI Driver | How Strada Supports It |
High containment on repetitive workflows | Pre-built flows for FNOL, billing, renewals, policy servicing, and agent support, trained on insurance language out of the box. |
Lower cost per call | AI agents answer 24/7, using intelligent retries, call scheduling, and real-time comprehension to replace manual volume. |
Reduced leakage & cycle time | Workflows automatically update CRMs, trigger tasks, send SMS/email follow-ups, and write back to core systems the moment a call ends. |
Faster follow-ups & fewer errors | Built-in accuracy evaluation tools reduce compliance errors and ensure consistent disclosures. |
Scalable operations without extra staffing | Strada handles peak loads and CAT-level surges with no engineering lift or additional personnel. |
Why it matters: Strada isn’t just a Voice AI engine; it’s an insurance operations platform that links conversational intelligence to real business actions, directly boosting containment, AHT reduction, policy retention, and claim cycle acceleration.
The Real Economics: How to Calculate Voice AI ROI
Voice AI is only “worth it” when the financial and operational benefits outweigh the investment. Below is a practical ROI framework tailored to insurers.
Cost Drivers Voice AI Reduces
Contact Center Costs
Lower headcount or lower peak staffing
Reduced overtime during CAT events
Less training spend
Lower QA and coaching requirements
Claims Costs
Faster FNOL → fewer errors → less leakage
Better documentation → fewer disputes
Improved fraud detection
Compliance Costs
Automated disclosures reduce risk of fines
Call transcripts create built-in auditability
Technology & Operational Costs
AI reduces reliance on legacy IVR upgrades
Lower call transfer and repeat-call costs
The ROI Formula for Voice AI
A simplified financial model insurers often use:
ROI=Labor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI CostAI Cost\text{ROI} = \frac{\text{Labor Savings} + \text{Claim Savings} + \text{Compliance Savings} + \text{Revenue Lift} - \text{AI Cost}}{\text{AI Cost}}ROI=AI CostLabor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI Cost
Where “AI Cost” includes:
Platform subscription
Telephony fees
Implementation and training
System integration
Sample ROI Scenario (Practical & Conservative)
For a mid-sized insurer:
1M inbound calls/year
Average cost per human-handled call: $6–$8
Voice AI automates 30% of volume (300k calls)
Automated call cost: $0.50–$1.00
Annual Savings:
Labor savings: (300k calls × $6) – (300k × $1) = $1.5M
Reduced claim leakage: ~1–2% improvement → $500k–$1M
Compliance/QA savings: ~$250k
Total benefit: $2.25M–$2.75M
Annual Voice AI cost: $600k–$900k
ROI: ~3× return in year one
Payback period: 4–7 months
This scenario is typical for carriers with moderate automation and no extreme call volume spikes.
Critical Success Factors: When Voice AI Works vs. Fails
The ROI is not only about the technology. It’s about implementation strategy.
When Voice AI Works Well
Clear, repetitive workflows
Strong integration with policy/claims systems
Good training data for call types
A phased rollout (e.g., start with billing or claims status)
Executive sponsorship + call center buy-in
Successful insurers treat Voice AI as a long-term capability, not a one-time project.
When Voice AI Fails
Overly broad scope at launch
Poor speech recognition tuning
Lack of escalation paths to humans
Not changing internal processes
No measurement framework
The fastest way to kill ROI is to launch “everything at once” with generic flows.
Adoption Triggers in the Insurance Industry
Insurers typically adopt Voice AI because of one or more of the following:
Labor shortages
High claims volume / CAT events
Digital transformation mandates
Cost pressure
Regulatory audit findings
Growing policyholder expectations for 24/7 service
These triggers often speed up business cases and unlock funding.
Measuring Voice AI ROI: What Insurers Should Track
These metrics provide the clearest visibility into value creation.
Category | Metric | Description | Typical Benchmarks (Insurance) |
Automation Metrics | Containment Rate | % of calls fully handled by AI without human intervention | 30–70% depending on use case complexity |
Partial Automation | AI completes part of the workflow; agent finishes | 20–40% of remaining calls show meaningful time reduction | |
Transfer Reduction | Decrease in agent-to-agent or IVR transfers | 20–50% reduction | |
AHT Improvement | Drop in average handle time via pre-gathered info or full automation | 10–40% improvement | |
Customer Metrics | CSAT / NPS for Voice AI Journeys | Customer satisfaction with AI-led interactions | Often equal or higher than human-only journeys; +5 to +20 points |
Call Abandonment Rate | Fewer callers hanging up due to wait times | Reduced to <5%, sometimes <2% | |
First-Call Resolution (FCR) | Issues resolved in one interaction | 70–90% for structured intents | |
Operational Metrics | Claims Cycle Times | Speed from FNOL to settlement milestones | 5–20% faster, depending on automation scope |
Underwriting Turnaround Times | Time required to qualify and price risk | 10–30% faster with automated intake | |
Inquiry Backlogs | Outstanding service queues | 30–80% reduction | |
Agent Productivity | More calls or higher-value work handled per agent | 20–50% productivity lift | |
Financial Metrics | Cost per Call | Fully loaded cost per customer interaction | Reduced from $4–$14 → <$1 with AI |
Staffing Reduction | Lower need for temp or surge staffing | 10–30% reduction without layoffs, often via attrition | |
Claim Leakage Reduction | Avoidable overpayments due to errors or delays | 1–3% reduction depending on claim type | |
Revenue Lift | Retention + faster follow-up + better lead routing | 1–5% lift in high-volume lines |
Insurers who track these KPIs monthly typically see ROI more clearly and justify expansion into new call types.
Implementation Roadmap: A Practical 3-Phase Approach
Below is a highly usable roadmap insurers have successfully executed.
Phase 1: Prove Value in 90 Days (Pilot)
Scope examples:
Billing inquiries
Claim status calls
Simple FNOL workflows
Key actions:
Map 5–10 common call intents
Integrate with telephony and CRM
Train with historical transcripts
Route complex calls to humans
Success criteria:
≥30% containment
Positive customer feedback
Reduced AHT
Phase 2: Expand to High-Value Journeys
Scope examples:
Full FNOL
Underwriting triage
Proactive outbound notifications
Key actions:
Integrate deeper into policy admin/claims systems
Add fraud-signal detection
Automate SMS/email follow-ups
Success criteria:
Measurable claim cycle-time reduction
Reduced backlogs
Lower labor demand
Phase 3: Enterprise-Wide Voice AI
Scope examples:
Agent assist for contact center
Agent assist for underwriting
Broker support interactions
End-to-end policy servicing
Key actions:
Standardize AI operations
Automate QA and compliance reviews
Use AI analytics to improve products
Build internal Voice AI governance
Success criteria:
Consistent cost-per-call reduction
Year-over-year claim leakage improvement
Reduced training time for staff
Risks, Limitations, & Mitigations
Voice AI is powerful, but insurers must plan for common pitfalls.
Category | Risk | Mitigation |
Accuracy Issues | Misunderstood customer speech or background noise | Use domain-specific language models; tune for accents; test with real claimants |
Regulatory Complexity | Noncompliant disclosures or procedural mistakes | Hard-code required disclosures; maintain full transcripts for auditability |
Customer Perception | Negative reaction to automation or perceived loss of human touch | Offer instant “talk to a person” fallback; keep explanations clear and human-friendly |
Integration Delays | Projects stalling due to missing access to internal systems | Phase integrations; begin with low-integration use cases to build organizational buy-in |
Over-automation | Applying AI to sensitive or judgment-heavy claim scenarios | Use AI for data gathering and routine tasks; keep humans for empathy and complex decisions |
Conclusion: Is Voice AI Worth It for Insurers?
Yes! When implemented strategically, Voice AI delivers one of the fastest and strongest ROIs in the insurance technology stack.
The value is clearest in:
Claims intake
Billing
Policy servicing
Underwriting triage
Status updates
Insurers regularly achieve:
2×–4× ROI in year one
30–70% automation on targeted call types
Reduced handling time, leakage, and operational costs
Improved customer and agent experience
The key is not investing in “Voice AI everywhere,” but in Voice AI where it works best: high-volume, predictable, repetitive, and data-driven interactions.
With the right roadmap, integrations, and governance, Voice AI becomes a strategic capability that delivers measurable financial value and helps insurers operate faster, leaner, and more competitively.
Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the biggest mistake insurers make when calculating ROI for Voice AI?
They only look at labor savings. Real ROI also comes from leakage reduction, faster claim cycles, fewer compliance errors, and improved retention, which together often outweigh labor savings.
How can insurers avoid over-automating sensitive claim moments?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
Which insurance teams feel the impact of Voice AI first?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
How do insurers know if a Voice AI pilot is succeeding early on?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
Why does Voice AI adoption accelerate during high-volume peaks like CAT events?
Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.
Table of Contents
Carriers, MGAs, and brokers scale revenue-driving phone calls with Strada's conversational AI platform.
Start scaling with voice AI agents today
Join innovative carriers and MGAs transforming their calls with Strada.
© 2025 Strada API, Inc.
© 2025 Strada API, Inc.
© 2025 Strada API, Inc.
