Blog

/

AI & Automation

Is Voice AI Worth It? New ROI Insights for Insurers

Amir Prodensky

CEO

Dec 5, 2025

7 min read

Real cost savings, conversion gains, and operational impact explained

Key takeaways:

  1. Voice AI delivers ROI when deployed in specific high-volume workflows like FNOL, billing, claims status, and underwriting triage.

  2. Automation drives major cost savings. Typical carriers see 30–70% containment, reduced AHT, lower staffing needs, and fewer claim errors.

  3. Financial returns are fast. Many insurers achieve 3–6× ROI in the first year, with payback in under 3 months.

  4. Success depends on focused rollout. Start narrow (billing or status calls), integrate deeply, and expand based on measurable results.

  5. ROI fails when scope is too broad or poorly integrated. The winners treat Voice AI as a long-term operational capability, not a one-off tool.

Insurers are once again revisiting Voice AI, but this time with a very different mindset.

Earlier generations of automated voice systems (IVRs, simple phone bots) promised cost savings but often delivered customer frustration. Modern Voice AI, however, is not a menu system or a rules-based bot. It’s a conversational, adaptive, analytics-rich interface powered by large language models and enterprise-grade speech recognition.

For insurers facing tight margins, competitive pressure, and rising CX expectations, Voice AI is emerging as a compelling tool. But the practical question (“Is it worth it?”), requires more than hype. 

It requires ROI clarity. 

And the industry is already signaling the answer: while 57% of leaders expect measurable ROI within 12 months, organizations are already capturing value. Consistent with last quarter, 97% of leaders are seeing productivity gains, 94% report improved profitability, and 91% say the quality of work itself is rising.

This paper provides data-driven, operational, and financial insights to help insurers evaluate the real return on investing in Voice AI.

Where Voice AI Actually Creates Value in Insurance

The ROI depends on where the technology is deployed. Below are the highest-yield use cases, the reason they work, and what insurers typically achieve.

First Notice of Loss (FNOL)

Why FNOL is ideal for Voice AI:

  • High volume

  • Emotionally charged calls

  • Repetitive question patterns

  • Data collection is structured

  • High cost for human-only handling

What Voice AI can do:

  • Guide callers through step-by-step data capture

  • Summarize claims

  • Populate core system fields

  • Detect fraud signals

  • Escalate complex cases to humans with context

Typical outcomes:

  • 30–50% reduction in FNOL handling time

  • 10–20% reduction in claim cycle time (faster routing, faster documentation)

  • Improved fraud detection accuracy at intake

ROI Rationale: Faster FNOL improves customer satisfaction, reduces leakage, and cuts staffing requirements during peak events.

Billing & Payments

Billing calls make up 20–35% of contact center volume at many carriers.

Voice AI can:

  • Answer balance and policy questions

  • Take payments

  • Walk through billing changes

  • Manage due-date inquiries

Typical outcomes:

  • 50–70% containment on billing calls

  • Lower abandonment

  • Reduced PCI risk (AI can handle secure payment entry)

ROI Rationale: Automating repetitive billing inquiries is one of the fastest payback Voice AI deployments, often achieving positive ROI in < 12 months due to volume alone.

Underwriting Triage and Pre-Qualification

Underwriting teams spend time chasing missing data and sorting submissions.

Voice AI can:

  • Call applicants or brokers for missing information

  • Pre-qualify small commercial or personal-lines submissions

  • Document conversations and attach summaries to the file

Typical outcomes:

  • 20–30% reduction in underwriting workload

  • Faster quote turnaround

  • Cleaner submissions → higher bind rates

ROI Rationale: By removing low-value tasks, underwriters spend more time on risk evaluation and relationship-driven selling.

Claims Status Calls

This is one of the most labor-intensive but easy-to-automate categories.

Voice AI can:

  • Provide real-time claim status

  • Update customers on adjuster assignments

  • Proactively notify policyholders of changes

Typical outcomes:

  • 60–80% automation possible

  • Significant call deflection from adjusters

  • Higher NPS due to proactive communication

ROI Rationale: Reducing inbound status calls protects adjuster time, often saving the highest-value human roles.

Agent Support and Policy Servicing

Voice AI is increasingly used internally for agents who need quick answers.

Voice AI can:

  • Lookup underwriting rules

  • Retrieve policy details

  • Provide scripting for regulated interactions

  • Help agents produce disclosures

Typical outcomes:

  • 20–25% improvement in agent handle time

  • Reduced regulatory errors

  • Faster onboarding of new reps

ROI Rationale: Unlike customer-facing automations, agent-assist has extremely high adoption and low risk.

How Strada Directly Accelerates Voice AI ROI

Strada delivers the outcomes described in this paper by providing insurance-specific conversational agents and pre-built workflows that turn calls into immediate business action.

 Instead of generic automation, Strada plugs directly into underwriting, claims, AMS, billing, and CRM systems so insurers see measurable ROI from day one.

What makes Strada correlate strongly with these ROI drivers: 

ROI Driver

How Strada Supports It

High containment on repetitive workflows

Pre-built flows for FNOL, billing, renewals, policy servicing, and agent support, trained on insurance language out of the box.

Lower cost per call

AI agents answer 24/7, using intelligent retries, call scheduling, and real-time comprehension to replace manual volume.

Reduced leakage & cycle time

Workflows automatically update CRMs, trigger tasks, send SMS/email follow-ups, and write back to core systems the moment a call ends.

Faster follow-ups & fewer errors

Built-in accuracy evaluation tools reduce compliance errors and ensure consistent disclosures.

Scalable operations without extra staffing

Strada handles peak loads and CAT-level surges with no engineering lift or additional personnel.

Why it matters: Strada isn’t just a Voice AI engine; it’s an insurance operations platform that links conversational intelligence to real business actions, directly boosting containment, AHT reduction, policy retention, and claim cycle acceleration.

The Real Economics: How to Calculate Voice AI ROI

Voice AI is only “worth it” when the financial and operational benefits outweigh the investment. Below is a practical ROI framework tailored to insurers.

Cost Drivers Voice AI Reduces

Contact Center Costs

  • Lower headcount or lower peak staffing

  • Reduced overtime during CAT events

  • Less training spend

  • Lower QA and coaching requirements

Claims Costs

  • Faster FNOL → fewer errors → less leakage

  • Better documentation → fewer disputes

  • Improved fraud detection

Compliance Costs

  • Automated disclosures reduce risk of fines

  • Call transcripts create built-in auditability

Technology & Operational Costs

  • AI reduces reliance on legacy IVR upgrades

  • Lower call transfer and repeat-call costs

The ROI Formula for Voice AI

A simplified financial model insurers often use:

ROI=Labor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI CostAI Cost\text{ROI} = \frac{\text{Labor Savings} + \text{Claim Savings} + \text{Compliance Savings} + \text{Revenue Lift} - \text{AI Cost}}{\text{AI Cost}}ROI=AI CostLabor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI Cost​

Where “AI Cost” includes:

  • Platform subscription

  • Telephony fees

  • Implementation and training

  • System integration

Sample ROI Scenario (Practical & Conservative)

For a mid-sized insurer:

  • 1M inbound calls/year

  • Average cost per human-handled call: $6–$8

  • Voice AI automates 30% of volume (300k calls)

  • Automated call cost: $0.50–$1.00

Annual Savings:

  • Labor savings: (300k calls × $6) – (300k × $1) = $1.5M

  • Reduced claim leakage: ~1–2% improvement → $500k–$1M

  • Compliance/QA savings: ~$250k

Total benefit: $2.25M–$2.75M

Annual Voice AI cost: $600k–$900k

ROI: ~3× return in year one

Payback period: 4–7 months

This scenario is typical for carriers with moderate automation and no extreme call volume spikes.

Critical Success Factors: When Voice AI Works vs. Fails

The ROI is not only about the technology. It’s about implementation strategy.

When Voice AI Works Well

  • Clear, repetitive workflows

  • Strong integration with policy/claims systems

  • Good training data for call types

  • A phased rollout (e.g., start with billing or claims status)

  • Executive sponsorship + call center buy-in

Successful insurers treat Voice AI as a long-term capability, not a one-time project.

When Voice AI Fails

  • Overly broad scope at launch

  • Poor speech recognition tuning

  • Lack of escalation paths to humans

  • Not changing internal processes

  • No measurement framework

The fastest way to kill ROI is to launch “everything at once” with generic flows.

Adoption Triggers in the Insurance Industry

Insurers typically adopt Voice AI because of one or more of the following:

  • Labor shortages

  • High claims volume / CAT events

  • Digital transformation mandates

  • Cost pressure

  • Regulatory audit findings

  • Growing policyholder expectations for 24/7 service

These triggers often speed up business cases and unlock funding.

Measuring Voice AI ROI: What Insurers Should Track

These metrics provide the clearest visibility into value creation.

Category

Metric

Description

Typical Benchmarks (Insurance)

Automation Metrics

Containment Rate

% of calls fully handled by AI without human intervention

30–70% depending on use case complexity


Partial Automation

AI completes part of the workflow; agent finishes

20–40% of remaining calls show meaningful time reduction


Transfer Reduction

Decrease in agent-to-agent or IVR transfers

20–50% reduction


AHT Improvement

Drop in average handle time via pre-gathered info or full automation

10–40% improvement

Customer Metrics

CSAT / NPS for Voice AI Journeys

Customer satisfaction with AI-led interactions

Often equal or higher than human-only journeys; +5 to +20 points


Call Abandonment Rate

Fewer callers hanging up due to wait times

Reduced to <5%, sometimes <2%


First-Call Resolution (FCR)

Issues resolved in one interaction

70–90% for structured intents

Operational Metrics

Claims Cycle Times

Speed from FNOL to settlement milestones

5–20% faster, depending on automation scope


Underwriting Turnaround Times

Time required to qualify and price risk

10–30% faster with automated intake


Inquiry Backlogs

Outstanding service queues

30–80% reduction


Agent Productivity

More calls or higher-value work handled per agent

20–50% productivity lift

Financial Metrics

Cost per Call

Fully loaded cost per customer interaction

Reduced from $4–$14 → <$1 with AI


Staffing Reduction

Lower need for temp or surge staffing

10–30% reduction without layoffs, often via attrition


Claim Leakage Reduction

Avoidable overpayments due to errors or delays

1–3% reduction depending on claim type


Revenue Lift

Retention + faster follow-up + better lead routing

1–5% lift in high-volume lines

Insurers who track these KPIs monthly typically see ROI more clearly and justify expansion into new call types.

Implementation Roadmap: A Practical 3-Phase Approach

Below is a highly usable roadmap insurers have successfully executed.

Phase 1: Prove Value in 90 Days (Pilot)

Scope examples:

  • Billing inquiries

  • Claim status calls

  • Simple FNOL workflows

Key actions:

  1. Map 5–10 common call intents

  2. Integrate with telephony and CRM

  3. Train with historical transcripts

  4. Route complex calls to humans

Success criteria:

  • ≥30% containment

  • Positive customer feedback

  • Reduced AHT

Phase 2: Expand to High-Value Journeys

Scope examples:

  • Full FNOL

  • Underwriting triage

  • Proactive outbound notifications

Key actions:

  • Integrate deeper into policy admin/claims systems

  • Add fraud-signal detection

  • Automate SMS/email follow-ups

Success criteria:

  • Measurable claim cycle-time reduction

  • Reduced backlogs

  • Lower labor demand

Phase 3: Enterprise-Wide Voice AI

Scope examples:

  • Agent assist for contact center

  • Agent assist for underwriting

  • Broker support interactions

  • End-to-end policy servicing

Key actions:

  • Standardize AI operations

  • Automate QA and compliance reviews

  • Use AI analytics to improve products

  • Build internal Voice AI governance

Success criteria:

  • Consistent cost-per-call reduction

  • Year-over-year claim leakage improvement

  • Reduced training time for staff

Risks, Limitations, & Mitigations

Voice AI is powerful, but insurers must plan for common pitfalls.

Category

Risk

Mitigation

Accuracy Issues

Misunderstood customer speech or background noise

Use domain-specific language models; tune for accents; test with real claimants

Regulatory Complexity

Noncompliant disclosures or procedural mistakes

Hard-code required disclosures; maintain full transcripts for auditability

Customer Perception

Negative reaction to automation or perceived loss of human touch

Offer instant “talk to a person” fallback; keep explanations clear and human-friendly

Integration Delays

Projects stalling due to missing access to internal systems

Phase integrations; begin with low-integration use cases to build organizational buy-in

Over-automation

Applying AI to sensitive or judgment-heavy claim scenarios

Use AI for data gathering and routine tasks; keep humans for empathy and complex decisions

Conclusion: Is Voice AI Worth It for Insurers?

Yes! When implemented strategically, Voice AI delivers one of the fastest and strongest ROIs in the insurance technology stack.

The value is clearest in:

  • Claims intake

  • Billing

  • Policy servicing

  • Underwriting triage

  • Status updates

Insurers regularly achieve:

  • 2×–4× ROI in year one

  • 30–70% automation on targeted call types

  • Reduced handling time, leakage, and operational costs

  • Improved customer and agent experience

The key is not investing in “Voice AI everywhere,” but in Voice AI where it works best: high-volume, predictable, repetitive, and data-driven interactions.

With the right roadmap, integrations, and governance, Voice AI becomes a strategic capability that delivers measurable financial value and helps insurers operate faster, leaner, and more competitively.

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the biggest mistake insurers make when calculating ROI for Voice AI?

They only look at labor savings. Real ROI also comes from leakage reduction, faster claim cycles, fewer compliance errors, and improved retention, which together often outweigh labor savings.

How can insurers avoid over-automating sensitive claim moments?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

Which insurance teams feel the impact of Voice AI first?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

How do insurers know if a Voice AI pilot is succeeding early on?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

Why does Voice AI adoption accelerate during high-volume peaks like CAT events?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

Start scaling with voice AI agents today

Join innovative carriers and MGAs transforming their calls with Strada.

Blog

/

AI & Automation

Is Voice AI Worth It? New ROI Insights for Insurers

Amir Prodensky

CEO

Dec 5, 2025

7 min read

Real cost savings, conversion gains, and operational impact explained

Key takeaways:

  1. Voice AI delivers ROI when deployed in specific high-volume workflows like FNOL, billing, claims status, and underwriting triage.

  2. Automation drives major cost savings. Typical carriers see 30–70% containment, reduced AHT, lower staffing needs, and fewer claim errors.

  3. Financial returns are fast. Many insurers achieve 3–6× ROI in the first year, with payback in under 3 months.

  4. Success depends on focused rollout. Start narrow (billing or status calls), integrate deeply, and expand based on measurable results.

  5. ROI fails when scope is too broad or poorly integrated. The winners treat Voice AI as a long-term operational capability, not a one-off tool.

Insurers are once again revisiting Voice AI, but this time with a very different mindset.

Earlier generations of automated voice systems (IVRs, simple phone bots) promised cost savings but often delivered customer frustration. Modern Voice AI, however, is not a menu system or a rules-based bot. It’s a conversational, adaptive, analytics-rich interface powered by large language models and enterprise-grade speech recognition.

For insurers facing tight margins, competitive pressure, and rising CX expectations, Voice AI is emerging as a compelling tool. But the practical question (“Is it worth it?”), requires more than hype. 

It requires ROI clarity. 

And the industry is already signaling the answer: while 57% of leaders expect measurable ROI within 12 months, organizations are already capturing value. Consistent with last quarter, 97% of leaders are seeing productivity gains, 94% report improved profitability, and 91% say the quality of work itself is rising.

This paper provides data-driven, operational, and financial insights to help insurers evaluate the real return on investing in Voice AI.

Where Voice AI Actually Creates Value in Insurance

The ROI depends on where the technology is deployed. Below are the highest-yield use cases, the reason they work, and what insurers typically achieve.

First Notice of Loss (FNOL)

Why FNOL is ideal for Voice AI:

  • High volume

  • Emotionally charged calls

  • Repetitive question patterns

  • Data collection is structured

  • High cost for human-only handling

What Voice AI can do:

  • Guide callers through step-by-step data capture

  • Summarize claims

  • Populate core system fields

  • Detect fraud signals

  • Escalate complex cases to humans with context

Typical outcomes:

  • 30–50% reduction in FNOL handling time

  • 10–20% reduction in claim cycle time (faster routing, faster documentation)

  • Improved fraud detection accuracy at intake

ROI Rationale: Faster FNOL improves customer satisfaction, reduces leakage, and cuts staffing requirements during peak events.

Billing & Payments

Billing calls make up 20–35% of contact center volume at many carriers.

Voice AI can:

  • Answer balance and policy questions

  • Take payments

  • Walk through billing changes

  • Manage due-date inquiries

Typical outcomes:

  • 50–70% containment on billing calls

  • Lower abandonment

  • Reduced PCI risk (AI can handle secure payment entry)

ROI Rationale: Automating repetitive billing inquiries is one of the fastest payback Voice AI deployments, often achieving positive ROI in < 12 months due to volume alone.

Underwriting Triage and Pre-Qualification

Underwriting teams spend time chasing missing data and sorting submissions.

Voice AI can:

  • Call applicants or brokers for missing information

  • Pre-qualify small commercial or personal-lines submissions

  • Document conversations and attach summaries to the file

Typical outcomes:

  • 20–30% reduction in underwriting workload

  • Faster quote turnaround

  • Cleaner submissions → higher bind rates

ROI Rationale: By removing low-value tasks, underwriters spend more time on risk evaluation and relationship-driven selling.

Claims Status Calls

This is one of the most labor-intensive but easy-to-automate categories.

Voice AI can:

  • Provide real-time claim status

  • Update customers on adjuster assignments

  • Proactively notify policyholders of changes

Typical outcomes:

  • 60–80% automation possible

  • Significant call deflection from adjusters

  • Higher NPS due to proactive communication

ROI Rationale: Reducing inbound status calls protects adjuster time, often saving the highest-value human roles.

Agent Support and Policy Servicing

Voice AI is increasingly used internally for agents who need quick answers.

Voice AI can:

  • Lookup underwriting rules

  • Retrieve policy details

  • Provide scripting for regulated interactions

  • Help agents produce disclosures

Typical outcomes:

  • 20–25% improvement in agent handle time

  • Reduced regulatory errors

  • Faster onboarding of new reps

ROI Rationale: Unlike customer-facing automations, agent-assist has extremely high adoption and low risk.

How Strada Directly Accelerates Voice AI ROI

Strada delivers the outcomes described in this paper by providing insurance-specific conversational agents and pre-built workflows that turn calls into immediate business action.

 Instead of generic automation, Strada plugs directly into underwriting, claims, AMS, billing, and CRM systems so insurers see measurable ROI from day one.

What makes Strada correlate strongly with these ROI drivers: 

ROI Driver

How Strada Supports It

High containment on repetitive workflows

Pre-built flows for FNOL, billing, renewals, policy servicing, and agent support, trained on insurance language out of the box.

Lower cost per call

AI agents answer 24/7, using intelligent retries, call scheduling, and real-time comprehension to replace manual volume.

Reduced leakage & cycle time

Workflows automatically update CRMs, trigger tasks, send SMS/email follow-ups, and write back to core systems the moment a call ends.

Faster follow-ups & fewer errors

Built-in accuracy evaluation tools reduce compliance errors and ensure consistent disclosures.

Scalable operations without extra staffing

Strada handles peak loads and CAT-level surges with no engineering lift or additional personnel.

Why it matters: Strada isn’t just a Voice AI engine; it’s an insurance operations platform that links conversational intelligence to real business actions, directly boosting containment, AHT reduction, policy retention, and claim cycle acceleration.

The Real Economics: How to Calculate Voice AI ROI

Voice AI is only “worth it” when the financial and operational benefits outweigh the investment. Below is a practical ROI framework tailored to insurers.

Cost Drivers Voice AI Reduces

Contact Center Costs

  • Lower headcount or lower peak staffing

  • Reduced overtime during CAT events

  • Less training spend

  • Lower QA and coaching requirements

Claims Costs

  • Faster FNOL → fewer errors → less leakage

  • Better documentation → fewer disputes

  • Improved fraud detection

Compliance Costs

  • Automated disclosures reduce risk of fines

  • Call transcripts create built-in auditability

Technology & Operational Costs

  • AI reduces reliance on legacy IVR upgrades

  • Lower call transfer and repeat-call costs

The ROI Formula for Voice AI

A simplified financial model insurers often use:

ROI=Labor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI CostAI Cost\text{ROI} = \frac{\text{Labor Savings} + \text{Claim Savings} + \text{Compliance Savings} + \text{Revenue Lift} - \text{AI Cost}}{\text{AI Cost}}ROI=AI CostLabor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI Cost​

Where “AI Cost” includes:

  • Platform subscription

  • Telephony fees

  • Implementation and training

  • System integration

Sample ROI Scenario (Practical & Conservative)

For a mid-sized insurer:

  • 1M inbound calls/year

  • Average cost per human-handled call: $6–$8

  • Voice AI automates 30% of volume (300k calls)

  • Automated call cost: $0.50–$1.00

Annual Savings:

  • Labor savings: (300k calls × $6) – (300k × $1) = $1.5M

  • Reduced claim leakage: ~1–2% improvement → $500k–$1M

  • Compliance/QA savings: ~$250k

Total benefit: $2.25M–$2.75M

Annual Voice AI cost: $600k–$900k

ROI: ~3× return in year one

Payback period: 4–7 months

This scenario is typical for carriers with moderate automation and no extreme call volume spikes.

Critical Success Factors: When Voice AI Works vs. Fails

The ROI is not only about the technology. It’s about implementation strategy.

When Voice AI Works Well

  • Clear, repetitive workflows

  • Strong integration with policy/claims systems

  • Good training data for call types

  • A phased rollout (e.g., start with billing or claims status)

  • Executive sponsorship + call center buy-in

Successful insurers treat Voice AI as a long-term capability, not a one-time project.

When Voice AI Fails

  • Overly broad scope at launch

  • Poor speech recognition tuning

  • Lack of escalation paths to humans

  • Not changing internal processes

  • No measurement framework

The fastest way to kill ROI is to launch “everything at once” with generic flows.

Adoption Triggers in the Insurance Industry

Insurers typically adopt Voice AI because of one or more of the following:

  • Labor shortages

  • High claims volume / CAT events

  • Digital transformation mandates

  • Cost pressure

  • Regulatory audit findings

  • Growing policyholder expectations for 24/7 service

These triggers often speed up business cases and unlock funding.

Measuring Voice AI ROI: What Insurers Should Track

These metrics provide the clearest visibility into value creation.

Category

Metric

Description

Typical Benchmarks (Insurance)

Automation Metrics

Containment Rate

% of calls fully handled by AI without human intervention

30–70% depending on use case complexity


Partial Automation

AI completes part of the workflow; agent finishes

20–40% of remaining calls show meaningful time reduction


Transfer Reduction

Decrease in agent-to-agent or IVR transfers

20–50% reduction


AHT Improvement

Drop in average handle time via pre-gathered info or full automation

10–40% improvement

Customer Metrics

CSAT / NPS for Voice AI Journeys

Customer satisfaction with AI-led interactions

Often equal or higher than human-only journeys; +5 to +20 points


Call Abandonment Rate

Fewer callers hanging up due to wait times

Reduced to <5%, sometimes <2%


First-Call Resolution (FCR)

Issues resolved in one interaction

70–90% for structured intents

Operational Metrics

Claims Cycle Times

Speed from FNOL to settlement milestones

5–20% faster, depending on automation scope


Underwriting Turnaround Times

Time required to qualify and price risk

10–30% faster with automated intake


Inquiry Backlogs

Outstanding service queues

30–80% reduction


Agent Productivity

More calls or higher-value work handled per agent

20–50% productivity lift

Financial Metrics

Cost per Call

Fully loaded cost per customer interaction

Reduced from $4–$14 → <$1 with AI


Staffing Reduction

Lower need for temp or surge staffing

10–30% reduction without layoffs, often via attrition


Claim Leakage Reduction

Avoidable overpayments due to errors or delays

1–3% reduction depending on claim type


Revenue Lift

Retention + faster follow-up + better lead routing

1–5% lift in high-volume lines

Insurers who track these KPIs monthly typically see ROI more clearly and justify expansion into new call types.

Implementation Roadmap: A Practical 3-Phase Approach

Below is a highly usable roadmap insurers have successfully executed.

Phase 1: Prove Value in 90 Days (Pilot)

Scope examples:

  • Billing inquiries

  • Claim status calls

  • Simple FNOL workflows

Key actions:

  1. Map 5–10 common call intents

  2. Integrate with telephony and CRM

  3. Train with historical transcripts

  4. Route complex calls to humans

Success criteria:

  • ≥30% containment

  • Positive customer feedback

  • Reduced AHT

Phase 2: Expand to High-Value Journeys

Scope examples:

  • Full FNOL

  • Underwriting triage

  • Proactive outbound notifications

Key actions:

  • Integrate deeper into policy admin/claims systems

  • Add fraud-signal detection

  • Automate SMS/email follow-ups

Success criteria:

  • Measurable claim cycle-time reduction

  • Reduced backlogs

  • Lower labor demand

Phase 3: Enterprise-Wide Voice AI

Scope examples:

  • Agent assist for contact center

  • Agent assist for underwriting

  • Broker support interactions

  • End-to-end policy servicing

Key actions:

  • Standardize AI operations

  • Automate QA and compliance reviews

  • Use AI analytics to improve products

  • Build internal Voice AI governance

Success criteria:

  • Consistent cost-per-call reduction

  • Year-over-year claim leakage improvement

  • Reduced training time for staff

Risks, Limitations, & Mitigations

Voice AI is powerful, but insurers must plan for common pitfalls.

Category

Risk

Mitigation

Accuracy Issues

Misunderstood customer speech or background noise

Use domain-specific language models; tune for accents; test with real claimants

Regulatory Complexity

Noncompliant disclosures or procedural mistakes

Hard-code required disclosures; maintain full transcripts for auditability

Customer Perception

Negative reaction to automation or perceived loss of human touch

Offer instant “talk to a person” fallback; keep explanations clear and human-friendly

Integration Delays

Projects stalling due to missing access to internal systems

Phase integrations; begin with low-integration use cases to build organizational buy-in

Over-automation

Applying AI to sensitive or judgment-heavy claim scenarios

Use AI for data gathering and routine tasks; keep humans for empathy and complex decisions

Conclusion: Is Voice AI Worth It for Insurers?

Yes! When implemented strategically, Voice AI delivers one of the fastest and strongest ROIs in the insurance technology stack.

The value is clearest in:

  • Claims intake

  • Billing

  • Policy servicing

  • Underwriting triage

  • Status updates

Insurers regularly achieve:

  • 2×–4× ROI in year one

  • 30–70% automation on targeted call types

  • Reduced handling time, leakage, and operational costs

  • Improved customer and agent experience

The key is not investing in “Voice AI everywhere,” but in Voice AI where it works best: high-volume, predictable, repetitive, and data-driven interactions.

With the right roadmap, integrations, and governance, Voice AI becomes a strategic capability that delivers measurable financial value and helps insurers operate faster, leaner, and more competitively.

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the biggest mistake insurers make when calculating ROI for Voice AI?

They only look at labor savings. Real ROI also comes from leakage reduction, faster claim cycles, fewer compliance errors, and improved retention, which together often outweigh labor savings.

How can insurers avoid over-automating sensitive claim moments?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

Which insurance teams feel the impact of Voice AI first?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

How do insurers know if a Voice AI pilot is succeeding early on?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

Why does Voice AI adoption accelerate during high-volume peaks like CAT events?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

Start scaling with voice AI agents today

Join innovative carriers and MGAs transforming their calls with Strada.

Blog

/

AI & Automation

Is Voice AI Worth It? New ROI Insights for Insurers

Amir Prodensky

CEO

Dec 5, 2025

7 min read

Real cost savings, conversion gains, and operational impact explained

Key takeaways:

  1. Voice AI delivers ROI when deployed in specific high-volume workflows like FNOL, billing, claims status, and underwriting triage.

  2. Automation drives major cost savings. Typical carriers see 30–70% containment, reduced AHT, lower staffing needs, and fewer claim errors.

  3. Financial returns are fast. Many insurers achieve 3–6× ROI in the first year, with payback in under 3 months.

  4. Success depends on focused rollout. Start narrow (billing or status calls), integrate deeply, and expand based on measurable results.

  5. ROI fails when scope is too broad or poorly integrated. The winners treat Voice AI as a long-term operational capability, not a one-off tool.

Insurers are once again revisiting Voice AI, but this time with a very different mindset.

Earlier generations of automated voice systems (IVRs, simple phone bots) promised cost savings but often delivered customer frustration. Modern Voice AI, however, is not a menu system or a rules-based bot. It’s a conversational, adaptive, analytics-rich interface powered by large language models and enterprise-grade speech recognition.

For insurers facing tight margins, competitive pressure, and rising CX expectations, Voice AI is emerging as a compelling tool. But the practical question (“Is it worth it?”), requires more than hype. 

It requires ROI clarity. 

And the industry is already signaling the answer: while 57% of leaders expect measurable ROI within 12 months, organizations are already capturing value. Consistent with last quarter, 97% of leaders are seeing productivity gains, 94% report improved profitability, and 91% say the quality of work itself is rising.

This paper provides data-driven, operational, and financial insights to help insurers evaluate the real return on investing in Voice AI.

Where Voice AI Actually Creates Value in Insurance

The ROI depends on where the technology is deployed. Below are the highest-yield use cases, the reason they work, and what insurers typically achieve.

First Notice of Loss (FNOL)

Why FNOL is ideal for Voice AI:

  • High volume

  • Emotionally charged calls

  • Repetitive question patterns

  • Data collection is structured

  • High cost for human-only handling

What Voice AI can do:

  • Guide callers through step-by-step data capture

  • Summarize claims

  • Populate core system fields

  • Detect fraud signals

  • Escalate complex cases to humans with context

Typical outcomes:

  • 30–50% reduction in FNOL handling time

  • 10–20% reduction in claim cycle time (faster routing, faster documentation)

  • Improved fraud detection accuracy at intake

ROI Rationale: Faster FNOL improves customer satisfaction, reduces leakage, and cuts staffing requirements during peak events.

Billing & Payments

Billing calls make up 20–35% of contact center volume at many carriers.

Voice AI can:

  • Answer balance and policy questions

  • Take payments

  • Walk through billing changes

  • Manage due-date inquiries

Typical outcomes:

  • 50–70% containment on billing calls

  • Lower abandonment

  • Reduced PCI risk (AI can handle secure payment entry)

ROI Rationale: Automating repetitive billing inquiries is one of the fastest payback Voice AI deployments, often achieving positive ROI in < 12 months due to volume alone.

Underwriting Triage and Pre-Qualification

Underwriting teams spend time chasing missing data and sorting submissions.

Voice AI can:

  • Call applicants or brokers for missing information

  • Pre-qualify small commercial or personal-lines submissions

  • Document conversations and attach summaries to the file

Typical outcomes:

  • 20–30% reduction in underwriting workload

  • Faster quote turnaround

  • Cleaner submissions → higher bind rates

ROI Rationale: By removing low-value tasks, underwriters spend more time on risk evaluation and relationship-driven selling.

Claims Status Calls

This is one of the most labor-intensive but easy-to-automate categories.

Voice AI can:

  • Provide real-time claim status

  • Update customers on adjuster assignments

  • Proactively notify policyholders of changes

Typical outcomes:

  • 60–80% automation possible

  • Significant call deflection from adjusters

  • Higher NPS due to proactive communication

ROI Rationale: Reducing inbound status calls protects adjuster time, often saving the highest-value human roles.

Agent Support and Policy Servicing

Voice AI is increasingly used internally for agents who need quick answers.

Voice AI can:

  • Lookup underwriting rules

  • Retrieve policy details

  • Provide scripting for regulated interactions

  • Help agents produce disclosures

Typical outcomes:

  • 20–25% improvement in agent handle time

  • Reduced regulatory errors

  • Faster onboarding of new reps

ROI Rationale: Unlike customer-facing automations, agent-assist has extremely high adoption and low risk.

How Strada Directly Accelerates Voice AI ROI

Strada delivers the outcomes described in this paper by providing insurance-specific conversational agents and pre-built workflows that turn calls into immediate business action.

 Instead of generic automation, Strada plugs directly into underwriting, claims, AMS, billing, and CRM systems so insurers see measurable ROI from day one.

What makes Strada correlate strongly with these ROI drivers: 

ROI Driver

How Strada Supports It

High containment on repetitive workflows

Pre-built flows for FNOL, billing, renewals, policy servicing, and agent support, trained on insurance language out of the box.

Lower cost per call

AI agents answer 24/7, using intelligent retries, call scheduling, and real-time comprehension to replace manual volume.

Reduced leakage & cycle time

Workflows automatically update CRMs, trigger tasks, send SMS/email follow-ups, and write back to core systems the moment a call ends.

Faster follow-ups & fewer errors

Built-in accuracy evaluation tools reduce compliance errors and ensure consistent disclosures.

Scalable operations without extra staffing

Strada handles peak loads and CAT-level surges with no engineering lift or additional personnel.

Why it matters: Strada isn’t just a Voice AI engine; it’s an insurance operations platform that links conversational intelligence to real business actions, directly boosting containment, AHT reduction, policy retention, and claim cycle acceleration.

The Real Economics: How to Calculate Voice AI ROI

Voice AI is only “worth it” when the financial and operational benefits outweigh the investment. Below is a practical ROI framework tailored to insurers.

Cost Drivers Voice AI Reduces

Contact Center Costs

  • Lower headcount or lower peak staffing

  • Reduced overtime during CAT events

  • Less training spend

  • Lower QA and coaching requirements

Claims Costs

  • Faster FNOL → fewer errors → less leakage

  • Better documentation → fewer disputes

  • Improved fraud detection

Compliance Costs

  • Automated disclosures reduce risk of fines

  • Call transcripts create built-in auditability

Technology & Operational Costs

  • AI reduces reliance on legacy IVR upgrades

  • Lower call transfer and repeat-call costs

The ROI Formula for Voice AI

A simplified financial model insurers often use:

ROI=Labor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI CostAI Cost\text{ROI} = \frac{\text{Labor Savings} + \text{Claim Savings} + \text{Compliance Savings} + \text{Revenue Lift} - \text{AI Cost}}{\text{AI Cost}}ROI=AI CostLabor Savings+Claim Savings+Compliance Savings+Revenue Lift−AI Cost​

Where “AI Cost” includes:

  • Platform subscription

  • Telephony fees

  • Implementation and training

  • System integration

Sample ROI Scenario (Practical & Conservative)

For a mid-sized insurer:

  • 1M inbound calls/year

  • Average cost per human-handled call: $6–$8

  • Voice AI automates 30% of volume (300k calls)

  • Automated call cost: $0.50–$1.00

Annual Savings:

  • Labor savings: (300k calls × $6) – (300k × $1) = $1.5M

  • Reduced claim leakage: ~1–2% improvement → $500k–$1M

  • Compliance/QA savings: ~$250k

Total benefit: $2.25M–$2.75M

Annual Voice AI cost: $600k–$900k

ROI: ~3× return in year one

Payback period: 4–7 months

This scenario is typical for carriers with moderate automation and no extreme call volume spikes.

Critical Success Factors: When Voice AI Works vs. Fails

The ROI is not only about the technology. It’s about implementation strategy.

When Voice AI Works Well

  • Clear, repetitive workflows

  • Strong integration with policy/claims systems

  • Good training data for call types

  • A phased rollout (e.g., start with billing or claims status)

  • Executive sponsorship + call center buy-in

Successful insurers treat Voice AI as a long-term capability, not a one-time project.

When Voice AI Fails

  • Overly broad scope at launch

  • Poor speech recognition tuning

  • Lack of escalation paths to humans

  • Not changing internal processes

  • No measurement framework

The fastest way to kill ROI is to launch “everything at once” with generic flows.

Adoption Triggers in the Insurance Industry

Insurers typically adopt Voice AI because of one or more of the following:

  • Labor shortages

  • High claims volume / CAT events

  • Digital transformation mandates

  • Cost pressure

  • Regulatory audit findings

  • Growing policyholder expectations for 24/7 service

These triggers often speed up business cases and unlock funding.

Measuring Voice AI ROI: What Insurers Should Track

These metrics provide the clearest visibility into value creation.

Category

Metric

Description

Typical Benchmarks (Insurance)

Automation Metrics

Containment Rate

% of calls fully handled by AI without human intervention

30–70% depending on use case complexity


Partial Automation

AI completes part of the workflow; agent finishes

20–40% of remaining calls show meaningful time reduction


Transfer Reduction

Decrease in agent-to-agent or IVR transfers

20–50% reduction


AHT Improvement

Drop in average handle time via pre-gathered info or full automation

10–40% improvement

Customer Metrics

CSAT / NPS for Voice AI Journeys

Customer satisfaction with AI-led interactions

Often equal or higher than human-only journeys; +5 to +20 points


Call Abandonment Rate

Fewer callers hanging up due to wait times

Reduced to <5%, sometimes <2%


First-Call Resolution (FCR)

Issues resolved in one interaction

70–90% for structured intents

Operational Metrics

Claims Cycle Times

Speed from FNOL to settlement milestones

5–20% faster, depending on automation scope


Underwriting Turnaround Times

Time required to qualify and price risk

10–30% faster with automated intake


Inquiry Backlogs

Outstanding service queues

30–80% reduction


Agent Productivity

More calls or higher-value work handled per agent

20–50% productivity lift

Financial Metrics

Cost per Call

Fully loaded cost per customer interaction

Reduced from $4–$14 → <$1 with AI


Staffing Reduction

Lower need for temp or surge staffing

10–30% reduction without layoffs, often via attrition


Claim Leakage Reduction

Avoidable overpayments due to errors or delays

1–3% reduction depending on claim type


Revenue Lift

Retention + faster follow-up + better lead routing

1–5% lift in high-volume lines

Insurers who track these KPIs monthly typically see ROI more clearly and justify expansion into new call types.

Implementation Roadmap: A Practical 3-Phase Approach

Below is a highly usable roadmap insurers have successfully executed.

Phase 1: Prove Value in 90 Days (Pilot)

Scope examples:

  • Billing inquiries

  • Claim status calls

  • Simple FNOL workflows

Key actions:

  1. Map 5–10 common call intents

  2. Integrate with telephony and CRM

  3. Train with historical transcripts

  4. Route complex calls to humans

Success criteria:

  • ≥30% containment

  • Positive customer feedback

  • Reduced AHT

Phase 2: Expand to High-Value Journeys

Scope examples:

  • Full FNOL

  • Underwriting triage

  • Proactive outbound notifications

Key actions:

  • Integrate deeper into policy admin/claims systems

  • Add fraud-signal detection

  • Automate SMS/email follow-ups

Success criteria:

  • Measurable claim cycle-time reduction

  • Reduced backlogs

  • Lower labor demand

Phase 3: Enterprise-Wide Voice AI

Scope examples:

  • Agent assist for contact center

  • Agent assist for underwriting

  • Broker support interactions

  • End-to-end policy servicing

Key actions:

  • Standardize AI operations

  • Automate QA and compliance reviews

  • Use AI analytics to improve products

  • Build internal Voice AI governance

Success criteria:

  • Consistent cost-per-call reduction

  • Year-over-year claim leakage improvement

  • Reduced training time for staff

Risks, Limitations, & Mitigations

Voice AI is powerful, but insurers must plan for common pitfalls.

Category

Risk

Mitigation

Accuracy Issues

Misunderstood customer speech or background noise

Use domain-specific language models; tune for accents; test with real claimants

Regulatory Complexity

Noncompliant disclosures or procedural mistakes

Hard-code required disclosures; maintain full transcripts for auditability

Customer Perception

Negative reaction to automation or perceived loss of human touch

Offer instant “talk to a person” fallback; keep explanations clear and human-friendly

Integration Delays

Projects stalling due to missing access to internal systems

Phase integrations; begin with low-integration use cases to build organizational buy-in

Over-automation

Applying AI to sensitive or judgment-heavy claim scenarios

Use AI for data gathering and routine tasks; keep humans for empathy and complex decisions

Conclusion: Is Voice AI Worth It for Insurers?

Yes! When implemented strategically, Voice AI delivers one of the fastest and strongest ROIs in the insurance technology stack.

The value is clearest in:

  • Claims intake

  • Billing

  • Policy servicing

  • Underwriting triage

  • Status updates

Insurers regularly achieve:

  • 2×–4× ROI in year one

  • 30–70% automation on targeted call types

  • Reduced handling time, leakage, and operational costs

  • Improved customer and agent experience

The key is not investing in “Voice AI everywhere,” but in Voice AI where it works best: high-volume, predictable, repetitive, and data-driven interactions.

With the right roadmap, integrations, and governance, Voice AI becomes a strategic capability that delivers measurable financial value and helps insurers operate faster, leaner, and more competitively.

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the biggest mistake insurers make when calculating ROI for Voice AI?

They only look at labor savings. Real ROI also comes from leakage reduction, faster claim cycles, fewer compliance errors, and improved retention, which together often outweigh labor savings.

How can insurers avoid over-automating sensitive claim moments?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

Which insurance teams feel the impact of Voice AI first?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

How do insurers know if a Voice AI pilot is succeeding early on?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

Why does Voice AI adoption accelerate during high-volume peaks like CAT events?

Framer is a design tool that allows you to design websites on a freeform canvas, and then publish them as websites with a single click.

Start scaling with voice AI agents today

Join innovative carriers and MGAs transforming their calls with Strada.